For students dreaming of an Ivy League acceptance, headlines about legal battles and policy changes can feel unsettling. Will admissions rules change again? Will opportunities shrink or expand?
According to an original report by CNBC, the latest lawsuit filed by the Trump administration against Harvard University has reignited debate around admissions transparency and merit.
But for aspiring applicants, the bigger takeaway isn’t the courtroom drama — it’s how the admissions landscape is quietly becoming more competitive and academically driven.
Earlier this month, the Trump administration sued Harvard, accusing the university of not fully sharing race-related admissions data following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2023 decision that struck down race-conscious admissions policies.
The Justice Department says it needs the data to ensure that admissions decisions are free from discrimination and aligned with the court’s ruling. Harvard, however, has stated that it is cooperating in good faith and engaging with the government as required by law.
Experts quoted by CNBC suggest the case is also strategic. As one of the world’s wealthiest universities, Harvard is seen as a test case that could set precedents for other institutions.
For students, the effects of the Supreme Court ruling are more important than the lawsuit itself.
Since 2023:
• Admissions offices no longer consider race during application reviews.
• Standardized testing has been reinstated at Harvard from 2024.
• Greater emphasis is being placed on academic strength and measurable performance.
Interestingly, early data shows shifts in student demographics.
Asian American students made up 41% of admitted students in the Class of 2029, up significantly from earlier years. Experts told CNBC that such numbers suggest universities are adjusting their processes to comply with the new legal environment.
The lawsuit may also push institutions to become more transparent, opening up what some consultants call the previously “secretive” world of holistic admissions.
If students are worried that the controversy might reduce interest in elite colleges, the data suggests the opposite.
Applications to top universities continue to surge, pushing acceptance rates to historic lows:
• Harvard: under 4%
• Princeton University and Yale University: both under 5%
Two decades ago, these institutions admitted around 10–12% of applicants.
Experts told CNBC that legal battles are unlikely to affect demand. The brand value and global appeal of Ivy League institutions remain strong.
If there’s one clear message for future applicants, it’s this: academics matter more than ever.
Admissions consultants advise students to:
• Prioritise rigorous coursework (advanced subjects, challenging curricula)
• Aim for strong standardized test scores where required
• Build depth in extracurriculars rather than spreading too thin
• Demonstrate consistency, initiative and intellectual curiosity
“The bar for academic rigor has gone up,” one expert told CNBC. In other words, focus less on policy debates and more on building a strong academic profile.
Legal battles between governments and universities may dominate headlines, but for students, the path forward is surprisingly clear. Elite college admissions are becoming more merit-focused, more transparent and more competitive.
Instead of worrying about lawsuits or policy shifts, aspirants should channel their energy where it counts — strong academics, meaningful achievements and a clear personal narrative.
In today’s admissions race, the real advantage isn’t inside a courtroom. It’s in your classroom.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
