Harvard ends women’s symposium as DEI focus shifts to gender‑neutral program

Harvard University has decided to discontinue a long-running biannual symposium that highlighted the research of tenure-track women faculty. The decision comes after university leadership raised legal concerns about hosting single-gender events, according to reporting by The Harvard Crimson.

The symposium, run for roughly 15 years by the Standing Committee on Women (SCW), traditionally featured women speakers while remaining open to the full Faculty of Arts and Sciences (FAS) community. Faculty and staff have expressed concern that the cancellation could affect mentoring and networking opportunities for women scholars.

According to SCW Chair Mary D. Lewis, FAS leadership advised the committee to avoid inviting speakers based solely on gender.

In an October 3 meeting, Dean of Faculty Affairs and Planning Nina Zipser suggested either hosting the symposium without gender-based selection or allowing the FAS to take over the event, The Harvard Crimson reported.

“After several discussions within SCW, it became clear that there was no way to satisfy the FAS advisory without losing some sense of the spirit and purpose of the symposia,” Lewis said in a statement.

Faculty members expressed frustration over the guidance during a November 7 meeting, and in January, Lewis informed the committee that it would no longer host the symposium. The decision was described as a formal conclusion of the program, similar to other initiatives the committee has phased out in the past.

Zipser confirmed in a Wednesday email obtained by The Harvard Crimson that FAS plans to launch a gender-neutral version of the symposium.

The change reflects a broader trend at Harvard of reviewing diversity-focused programming following increased federal scrutiny.

Last April, the federal government raised concerns that Harvard may have engaged in disparate treatment in its hiring and promotion of white, Asian, male, and straight faculty. In response, the university has renamed offices and revised administrative language to remove explicit references to race, gender, and equity.

Despite ending the symposium, the SCW continues to support faculty careers through initiatives such as parental leave, tenure-clock extensions, and childcare policies. These programs, while often benefiting women disproportionately, have historically supported the wider faculty community.

Lewis highlighted that the committee has previously piloted programs that were later expanded FAS-wide, including a tenure-track mentoring program open to faculty of all genders.

She noted, however, that the original purpose of the women-focused symposium — mentoring, networking, and supporting women scholars — remains important.

“Nevertheless, I am concerned about the future of mentoring, networking, and support for women scholars at Harvard in the present climate,” Lewis wrote, as reported by The Harvard Crimson.

Harvard’s shift reflects an effort to balance legal compliance with continued support for faculty development, even as the university explores new formats for fostering inclusion and mentorship across all genders.