15.1 C
Delhi
Saturday, February 21, 2026

Blow to Elon Musk as US court refuses to scrap $243 million payout ruling in Tesla autopilot crash case

A federal judge has rejected a request by Tesla to scrap a $243 million payout to victims of a fatal 2019 crash involving an Autopilot-equipped Model S, according to a report by Reuters.

In a decision made public on Friday, US District Judge Beth Bloom in Miami said the evidence presented at trial “more than supported” the jury’s verdict, adding that Tesla has raised no new arguments to set the verdict aside.

The ruling comes after Tesla filed a motion to appeal the verdict last August in the product liability and wrongful death lawsuit. The automaker, led by Elon Musk has sought to have the verdict overturned or to secure a new trial in Florida’s Southern district court, CNBC reported earlier.

How much is Tesla directed to pay?

In August 2025, a jury awarded the victims $329 million in total damages, including $129 million in compensatory damages and $200m in punitive damages aimed at deterring Tesla from similar conduct in the future.

However, Gibson Dunn, the law firm representing Tesla in its appeal, argued that compensatory damages in the case should be sharply reduced from $129 million to no more than $69 million, CNBC reported.

Additionally, the firm also argued that punitive damages should either be scrapped entirely or reduced to, at most, three times compensatory damages, citing Florida’s statutory cap on such awards.

In their motion to appeal, Tesla’s lawyers argued that the Model S vehicle had no design defects, and maintained that, even if such defects were alleged, they could not have caused the crash. The company contends that the accident was entirely the result of driver’s error.

What caused the crash and who were the victims?

The fatal collision occured in 2019 in Key Largo district of Florida, in which 22-year-old Naibel Benavides was killed and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, was severely injured, CNBC reported.

The driver was identified as George McGee, who was operating his Tesla Model S sedan with the company’s Enhanced Autopilot system engaged, a partially automated driver-assistance feature.

While driving, McGee dropped his mobile phone and hurriedly bent down to pick it up. He later testified at the trial that he believed the Enhanced Autopilot system would automatically put brakes if it detected an obstacle in its way.

However, the Model S sped through an intersection at just over 60 miles per hour, crashing into a parked vehicle and striking its owners, who were standing on the other side of their car.

A jury in a Miami federal court earlier said in August that Tesla should compensate the family of the deceased and the injured survivor, paying a $242.5 million portion of a total $329 million in damages which they decided were appropriate, CNBC reported.

Latest

Trade deal with India will stand, says Trump

International Business News: TOI correspondent in Washington: US President Donald Trump said the recently concluded framework for an interim trade deal with Ind

Donald Trump announces 10% global tariffs after SC deems his reciprocal tariffs illegal

International Business News: A furious Donald Trump on Friday announced that he would be signing an executive order imposing a 10% global tariff. Trump’s stat

South Africa Cattle Virus Response in ‘Shambles’ Says Dairy Firm

Restrictions placed on the dairy industry by the South African government to curb an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease places it at serious risk, said one of t

Brazil’s Top Court Allows Police to Deepen Master Probe

A Brazilian Supreme Court justice broadened police access to a fraud investigation into Banco Master SA, effectively allowing authorities to deepen the probe th

Distributors, retailers risk missing out on Trump tariff refunds 

USA-TRUMP/TARIFFS-IMPORTERS (PIX):Distributors, retailers risk missing out on Trump tariff refunds 

Topics

Trump’s press conference over Supreme Court tariff ruling- key takeaways

President  Trump's extensive press conference highlighted the continued centrality of tariffs to his presidency and suggested that the Supreme Court’s decisi

Total Lunar Eclipse 2026: When is Chandra Grahan? check date, time and significance

Planets & Transits News: The first Chandra Grahan is going to take place on March 3, 2026. This will be an exciting celestial event for all the sky watchers and

Auspicious Time for Exams: What to do before you step out and astrological tips

Others News: As we all know that CBSE boards exams are going and you have prepared for your exams very well but now you are thinking to take further tips so tha

IIT: Just a stepping stone to UPSC?

Graduates, especially engineers, are increasingly opting for government job exams in India. This trend signals a shift in career preferences driven by job marke

‘India will be paying us tariffs, we will not be paying them tariffs,’ Trump says after US Supreme Court struck down IEEPA tariffs

US Supreme Court struck down Trump IEEPA tariffs. While Trump says India will be paying us tariffs, we will not be paying them tariffs; calls ruling deeply disa

Trump to ditch IEEPA tariffs; uses alternative legal powers, says US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent

After the US Supreme court strikes down Trump IEEPA Tariffs, President turns to Section 232, 301 & 122 for unchanged revenues.  

Trump signs 10% global tariffs order, calls Supreme Court ruling ‘deeply disappointing’

The new tariff will come into force almost immediately and will remain effective for approximately five months under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Section 122, 301 and 232: Trump’s legal arsenal for new global tariffs

After the Supreme Court blocked his emergency tariffs, Trump moved to impose a 10% global duty under Section 122 and signaled broader trade action through Secti
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img