15.1 C
Delhi
Saturday, February 21, 2026

Kentucky Supreme Court rules charter school funding law unconstitutional

The Kentucky Supreme Court ruled Thursday that a measure establishing public funding for charter schools violates the state Constitution, holding that public education funds are reserved for the common school system.

The decision affirms a lower court ruling that struck down the 2022 law, which had been enacted by the Republican dominated legislature over the veto of Democratic Governor Andy Beshear.

In a unanimous opinion, Justice Michelle M. Keller wrote that the Constitution does not permit the diversion of public education funds beyond the common public school structure.

“The Constitution as it stands is clear that it does not permit funneling public education funds outside the common public school system,” Keller wrote, according to the

A constitutional boundary

The ruling does not address whether charter schools are effective.

Instead, it rests on a constitutional interpretation that has shaped Kentucky’s education framework for more than a century.

Keller wrote that the court was not evaluating the policy merits of charter schools.

“We make no predictions about the potential success of charter schools or their ability to improve the education of the Commonwealth’s children, and we leave public policy evaluations to the Commonwealth’s designated policymakers — the General Assembly,” she wrote, the

reports.

At issue was whether state tax dollars could be directed to charter schools outside the traditional public system. The court concluded that existing constitutional language restricts such spending to common schools.

“The mandate implicates state education funds are for common schools and for nothing else,” Keller wrote, according to the

Legislative push and voter rejection

The funding measure was part of a broader effort by charter school supporters to establish a presence in Kentucky.

Charter schools have been legal in the state since 2017, but none have opened due to the absence of a funding mechanism.

In 2024, Kentucky voters rejected a ballot initiative that would have allowed lawmakers to allocate public tax dollars to students attending private or charter schools. The vote marked a separate setback for school choice advocates.

Supporters argue that charter schools provide parents with additional options and can better align schooling with student needs.

Opponents contend that redirecting public funds would strain existing public schools and raise concerns about student selection practices.

What the ruling means

The decision leaves the General Assembly with limited room to maneuver unless the Constitution is amended. While charter schools remain legal, the absence of public funding makes their launch unlikely under current law.

The court’s opinion frames education funding as a constitutional obligation tied to the common school system. Any future effort to shift public dollars toward charter institutions will require either voter approval or a different legal pathway.

For now, Kentucky’s public education funds remain confined to the system defined by its Constitution.

Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!

Latest

IIT: Just a stepping stone to UPSC?

Graduates, especially engineers, are increasingly opting for government job exams in India. This trend signals a shift in career preferences driven by job marke

University of Texas approves rule limiting ‘controversial’ course topics, raising academic freedom concerns

News News: The University of Texas System’s Board of Regents has unanimously approved a new rule requiring its universities to ensure students can graduate wi

Columbia and other universities at risk as court lifts block on DEI orders: Legal battle shifts to remanded proceedings

News News: A federal appeals court on February 6 allowed President Donald Trump’s executive orders targeting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiative

Tamil Nadu minister distributes laptops to 993 students

Chennai, Tamil Nadu Minister Govi Chezhiaan on Friday distributed...

UPSC CAPF 2026 notification released: Direct link to download, apply online here

News News: The Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) has released the official notification for the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF) Assistant Commandant 202

Topics

Trump’s press conference over Supreme Court tariff ruling- key takeaways

President  Trump's extensive press conference highlighted the continued centrality of tariffs to his presidency and suggested that the Supreme Court’s decisi

Total Lunar Eclipse 2026: When is Chandra Grahan? check date, time and significance

Planets & Transits News: The first Chandra Grahan is going to take place on March 3, 2026. This will be an exciting celestial event for all the sky watchers and

Auspicious Time for Exams: What to do before you step out and astrological tips

Others News: As we all know that CBSE boards exams are going and you have prepared for your exams very well but now you are thinking to take further tips so tha

IIT: Just a stepping stone to UPSC?

Graduates, especially engineers, are increasingly opting for government job exams in India. This trend signals a shift in career preferences driven by job marke

‘India will be paying us tariffs, we will not be paying them tariffs,’ Trump says after US Supreme Court struck down IEEPA tariffs

US Supreme Court struck down Trump IEEPA tariffs. While Trump says India will be paying us tariffs, we will not be paying them tariffs; calls ruling deeply disa

Trump to ditch IEEPA tariffs; uses alternative legal powers, says US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent

After the US Supreme court strikes down Trump IEEPA Tariffs, President turns to Section 232, 301 & 122 for unchanged revenues.  

Trump signs 10% global tariffs order, calls Supreme Court ruling ‘deeply disappointing’

The new tariff will come into force almost immediately and will remain effective for approximately five months under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Section 122, 301 and 232: Trump’s legal arsenal for new global tariffs

After the Supreme Court blocked his emergency tariffs, Trump moved to impose a 10% global duty under Section 122 and signaled broader trade action through Secti
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img