Iran’s military media has hit back sharply at Israel’s claim that one of its most visible war-time spokesmen is artificial intelligence, turning the accusation into a viral moment of mockery and psychological warfare.
“Wow! After 40 days of war, the Israeli army now shamefully claims that Colonel Ebrahim Zolfaghari is AI. It’s obvious, they’re intimidated by his growing popularity!” Iran Military Media said in a post accompanying a video response.
A VIRAL REBUTTAL — WITH A WINK
In the video, Colonel Ebrahim Zolfaghari appears to lean into the accusation with sarcasm. He jokingly confirms the AI theory, quipping about having six fingers, before smiling and raising a coffee cup. The clip then shifts into stylised visuals, turning black-and-white with pixelated sunglasses — a playful jab that has quickly spread across social media.
The performance underscores how both sides are increasingly blending propaganda with internet culture to shape narratives.
ISRAEL’S CLAIM: ‘HE SEEMS ARTIFICIAL’
The controversy began when the Israel Defense Forces suggested that Zolfaghari might not be real. In a post on its Farsi-language account, Israeli officials questioned whether the spokesperson had ever been seen outside controlled broadcasts.
“If you have seen him in an interview or in the field, tell us. If not, help us prove that he is an artificial intelligence product,” the post read.
The message went further, casting doubt on Iran’s credibility: Are “fictional characters” being used to communicate with the public?
THE FACE OF IRAN’S MESSAGING WAR
Zolfaghari has emerged as a central figure in Iran’s wartime communication strategy, serving as a spokesperson for the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters.
Dressed in military fatigues, he delivers pointed messages aimed at both Israel and the United States, often laced with taunts directed at Donald Trump.
In one widely circulated clip, he mocked Trump’s reliance on social media: “The outcome of war cannot be determined by tweets the result of war is determined on the field.”
In another, he ridiculed the US president’s rhetoric with a blunt line:
“Hey, Trump, you are fired You are familiar with this sentence.”
His tone — controlled, theatrical, and often provocative — has drawn comparisons to Iraq’s infamous wartime spokesman Muhammad Saeed al-Sahhaf, known as “Comical Ali.”
REAL OR AI? THE EVIDENCE DEBATE
The speculation over Zolfaghari’s identity reflects a deeper uncertainty shaped by modern information warfare. His digital presence appears largely tied to the current conflict, and his delivery — measured expressions, precise gestures — has led some viewers to question whether he is AI-generated.
But others point to details suggesting otherwise: consistent military insignia, natural language patterns, and older footage that may predate the war.
Cybersecurity analysts say the debate itself may be the point.
By questioning his existence, Israel could be attempting to provoke a live appearance or expose operational details. Meanwhile, Iran appears to be using the controversy to amplify his profile.
NARRATIVE BECOMES THE NEW BATTLEFIELD
For now, whether Zolfaghari is flesh-and-blood or simply an unusually polished spokesperson may matter less than the effect he is having. Iran is leaning into the controversy, framing it as proof of influence. Israel, meanwhile, is casting doubt to undermine credibility.
Between them, a new front has opened — one where memes, mockery, and machine learning are as much weapons as missiles.
And in that battle, even the question — is he real? — has become part of the strategy.
